|
Thursday, 04 March 2010 04:54 |
|
If you have an interest in utilising freshly extracted juice as part of your health routine, this article is likely to interest you. It is a follow-on from one I wrote a month or two ago called Juicin tips and misconceptions in which I shared some information I posted to a review on amazon.com for a blender people were using in place of a juice extractor. P. Elmore had some issues with what I said, and this article is my response to those issues.
|
|
|
Tuesday, 02 February 2010 03:04 |
|
Here's a cartoon rendition of your local supermarket that pretty much sums up the state of affairs down there in the ales. It's rare for me to visit a regular food outlet, and when I do it still amazes me to see what passes for "food" and "drinks" these days. 99% of what I see in most supermarkets is a far cry from anything our ancient ancestors would have considered food. Most of it is toxic crap, to put it bluntly.
|
|
Sunday, 31 January 2010 20:01 |
|
NOTE: This article has been republished from Medical Veritas,The Journal of truth in Health science. If you find this informative, please visit http://www.medicalveritas.org/ to subscribe to this journal. It will be well worth it.
PHARMAGANDA: A STUDY OF CONFLICTING INTEREST
by Leonard G. Horowitz and Sherri Kane
Abstract
Conflicting interests damagingly taint health science and medicine. The media has been most influential in this process. Pharmaceutical propaganda facilitates geopolitical and financial agendas particularly obvious in recent years concerning the H1N1 pandemic. In this regard, social conditioning, legislation, and health care administration has been profoundly impacted by propaganda. This study examines a new genre of public health-related Hollywood films, advanced by Michael Moore, funded by “genetopharmaceutical” industrialists and media propagandists. The authors evidence a “hostile takeover” of health science and medicine that has occurred, affecting care providers and consumers worldwide. They urge consideration of the financial forces involved advancing centralized international governance, World Health Organization directives, and a new society assimilating eugenic theology merged with biotechnology for “genetopharmaceutical” industrialization.
|
|
|
Sunday, 31 January 2010 19:44 |
|
NOTE: This article has been republished from Medical Veritas,The Journal of truth in Health science. If you find this informative, please visit http://www.medicalveritas.org/ to subscribe to this journal. It will be well worth it.
Are Current Childhood Vaccine programs compromising the genetics of present and future generations?
by Harold E. Buttram
Abstract
Previously published parts of this "Vaccine Overview" series reviewed the U.S. Congressional Hearings on Vaccine Safety (1999-December, 2004) which revealed gross deficiencies in vaccine safety testing by federal health bureaucracies (FDA, CDC, NIH, etc.), as defined by Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) and Quality of Evidence Ratings (QER).(2,3) Because of these deficiencies, we have no means of proving adverse vaccine reactions when they do occur. Since the growing patterns of adverse childhood health patterns have run parallel with increasing numbers of vaccines being administered (now up to 32 inoculations before school), it is reasonable and responsible to suspect a possible or likely causal relationship, and test this hypothesis. It is conceivable that adverse childhood health trends are accompanied by corresponding genetic compromise and hybridization. One potential source of this being large-scale vaccine contamination with retroviruses and their reverse transcriptase enzymes, capable of imprinting viral DNA into the genetics of children and future generations.
|
|
Tuesday, 01 December 2009 00:00 |
|
[Republication of a blog entry. Orginally published in Dec. 2004]
The profound significance of making I-statements
I imagine the first impression of someone reading this would be "What the heck does that mean... What's an I-statement?"—and understandably so.
The extent to which people in my cultural environment (the English speaking ones) talk in second person when discussing personal experience is almost 100% of what I hear. Hence it has become completely normal. So normal that some people I have met either resist the idea of changing this habit and/or find it really challenging to change it once they notice what's going on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 11 |
